Skip to content
Sunday, 25 October 2026RSS
World Firm Ledger

Institution record

Buenbit

Grupo RoagroBIT S.A.

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
3.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
Not suppliedRegulatedGrupo RoagroBIT S.A.2021

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Buenbit against peer institutions in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Buenbit (this record)
1 / 1Risk level not supplied3.00
Binance THNone on file0 / 0Risk level not supplied7.00
OKCoin JapanNone on file0 / 0Risk level not supplied6.00
TokenPocket WalletNone on file0 / 0Risk level not supplied5.80
HyperliquidNone on file0 / 0Risk level not supplied5.60
Kaikas walletNone on file0 / 0Risk level not supplied5.30

Buenbit: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Buenbit's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Buenbit (legal entity reference: Grupo RoagroBIT S.A.) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official public register.

Which of Buenbit's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Buenbit is registered at Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina and tracked under our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets scope based on its institutional service profile (multi-asset financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Buenbit's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Buenbit carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 3.0, risk & licensing: 3.0, brand: 3.0, market influence: 3.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Buenbit's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Buenbit, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (app.buenbit.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to .

Editorial briefings and compliance research from World Firm Ledger relevant to Buenbit's supervisory scope.

All research →
Buenbit — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | World Firm Ledger