1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
18FX vs 2C2P: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 18FX (PT. Eighteen Futures) and 2C2P (2C2P) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
2C2P outranks 18FX by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, 18FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas 2C2P holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 18FX | 2C2P | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 4.0 | +2.5 | 2C2P |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 4.0 | +2.5 | 2C2P |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | 2C2P |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 4.0 | +2.5 | 2C2P |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 4.0 | +2.5 | 2C2P |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 18FX vs 2C2P
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 18FX | 2C2P |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. Eighteen Futures | 2C2P |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Soho Rodeo Drive SRD 020, Jl Laksamana Yos Sudarso, PIK 2, Ebony Island, Penjaringan - Jakarta Utara 14430 | 128 Beach Road #21-04 Guoco Midtown Singapore 189773 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Commodities | online payments, cross-border payments |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 18FX and 2C2P against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 18FX vs 2C2P
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 18FX or 2C2P?
Both 18FX and 2C2P hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 18FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas 2C2P maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 18FX and 2C2P?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 18FX records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with 2C2P at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do 18FX and 2C2P differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
18FX lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while 2C2P lists online payments, cross-border payments with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 18FX or 2C2P?
18FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while 2C2P carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.