1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Access Direct vs Keepface: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Access Direct (Access Direct Markets Ltd.) and Keepface (Keepface Global, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Access Direct outranks Keepface by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Access Direct holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Keepface holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Access Direct | Keepface | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Access Direct |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Access Direct |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Access Direct |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Access Direct |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Access Direct |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Access Direct vs Keepface
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Access Direct | Keepface |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Access Direct Markets Ltd. | Keepface Global, Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED): #336851UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA): Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 3A, King George V Avenue, Floreal, Mauritius | Cluster R, AstroLabs, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, PO Box 336851, Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | ETF, stocks, CFDs, futures and FX | Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Access Direct and Keepface against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Access Direct vs Keepface
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Access Direct or Keepface?
Both Access Direct and Keepface hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Access Direct maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Keepface maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED), UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Access Direct and Keepface?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Access Direct records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Keepface at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Access Direct and Keepface differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Access Direct lists ETF, stocks, CFDs, futures and FX with execution software [MT5], while Keepface lists Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Access Direct or Keepface?
Access Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Keepface carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.