1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AF index vs Nomisma: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AF index (AF index limited) and Nomisma (NOMISMA HOLDINGS PTE LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Nomisma outranks AF index by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.1 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, AF index holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Nomisma holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AF index | Nomisma | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.1 | +0.1 | Nomisma |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.4 | +0.4 | Nomisma |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.7 | +0.7 | Nomisma |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.4 | +0.4 | Nomisma |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AF index vs Nomisma
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AF index | Nomisma |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AF index limited | NOMISMA HOLDINGS PTE LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 4 th Floor Room No 414,415, PSX Building, Khyaban-e-Aiwan-e-Iqbal, Lahore | Alexandra House, Central, Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AF index and Nomisma against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AF index vs Nomisma
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AF index or Nomisma?
Both AF index and Nomisma hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AF index maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Nomisma maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AF index and Nomisma?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AF index records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Nomisma at 1.1 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AF index and Nomisma differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AF index lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Nomisma lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AF index or Nomisma?
AF index carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Nomisma carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.