Skip to content
World Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CBCX vs Keepface: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CBCX (CBCX MARKETS LIMITED) and Keepface (Keepface Global, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cbcx-vs-keepface

CBCX outranks Keepface by +5.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, CBCX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Keepface holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCBCXKeepfaceScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.52.0+5.5CBCX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.52.0+5.5CBCX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.01.0+3.0CBCX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.52.0+5.5CBCX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.52.0+5.5CBCX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CBCX vs Keepface

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CBCX vs Keepface
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CBCX and Keepface.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCBCXKeepface
Primary Legal NameCBCX MARKETS LIMITEDKeepface Global, Inc.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED): #336851UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressAMR Building 3, 9 Concorde East Road, Bedfordview, 2007, South Africa Suite 403, 4th Floor, The Catalyst Building, Plot 40 Silicon Avenue, Ebene, Port Louis, Mauritius Intershore Suite, Le Sanalele Complex, PO Box 608, Apia, Samoa 20 Victoria St, London, SW1H 0NB, England, UKCluster R, AstroLabs, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, PO Box 336851, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, CommoditiesInfluencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, French, ThaiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CBCX and Keepface against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CBCX vs Keepface

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CBCX or Keepface?

CBCX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, CBCX maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Keepface maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED), UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CBCX and Keepface?

In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CBCX records an Overall Score of 7.5 (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Keepface at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do CBCX and Keepface differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CBCX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Keepface lists Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CBCX or Keepface?

CBCX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Keepface carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CBCX vs Keepface (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | World Firm Ledger