1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DEA vs POINTS Technology: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DEA (Digital Entertainment Asset) and POINTS Technology (POINTS Technology Pte Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
DEA outranks POINTS Technology by +3.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, DEA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas POINTS Technology holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DEA | POINTS Technology | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | DEA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.7 | +3.3 | DEA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.9 | +3.1 | DEA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.4 | +3.6 | DEA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DEA vs POINTS Technology
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DEA | POINTS Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Digital Entertainment Asset | POINTS Technology Pte Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | SG | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DEA and POINTS Technology against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DEA vs POINTS Technology
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DEA or POINTS Technology?
Both DEA and POINTS Technology hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, DEA maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas POINTS Technology maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DEA and POINTS Technology?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DEA records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with POINTS Technology at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.9, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do DEA and POINTS Technology differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DEA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while POINTS Technology lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DEA or POINTS Technology?
DEA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while POINTS Technology carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.