1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
EsaFX vs FOREX CT: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of EsaFX (PT Esandar Arthamas Berjangka) and FOREX CT (FOREX CT) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
EsaFX and FOREX CT are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, EsaFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FOREX CT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | EsaFX | FOREX CT | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | FOREX CT |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: EsaFX vs FOREX CT
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | EsaFX | FOREX CT |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT Esandar Arthamas Berjangka | FOREX CT |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Jl. Diponegoro No. 58 Surabaya 60264 Indonesia AGUNG PODOMORO LAND (APL) TOWER LT.36 UNIT T 7, JL. LETJEN S. PARMAN KAV.28, Desa/Kelurahan Tanjung Duren Selatan, Kec. Grogol Petamburan, Kota Adm. Jakarta Barat, Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Jakarta 11470, Indonesia. | AU |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, Metals, Energies | Spot metals, Commodities, Stock indices, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare EsaFX and FOREX CT against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: EsaFX vs FOREX CT
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: EsaFX or FOREX CT?
Both EsaFX and FOREX CT hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, EsaFX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FOREX CT maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between EsaFX and FOREX CT?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), EsaFX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FOREX CT at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do EsaFX and FOREX CT differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
EsaFX lists Forex, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while FOREX CT lists Spot metals, Commodities, Stock indices, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: EsaFX or FOREX CT?
EsaFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FOREX CT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.