1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Evest vs Keepface: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Evest (Evest) and Keepface (Keepface Global, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Evest outranks Keepface by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Evest holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 2 warning count(s), whereas Keepface holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Evest | Keepface | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Evest |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Evest |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Evest |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Evest vs Keepface
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Evest | Keepface |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Evest | Keepface Global, Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED): #336851UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 11 Blackheath Village London, United Kingdom SE3 9LA | Cluster R, AstroLabs, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, PO Box 336851, Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Trade, Invest, Online, evest, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 2 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Evest and Keepface against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Evest vs Keepface
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Evest or Keepface?
Evest holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Evest maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA, VFSC) with 2 warning flag(s), whereas Keepface maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED), UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Evest and Keepface?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Evest records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Keepface at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Evest and Keepface differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Evest lists general financial services with execution software [Trade, Invest, Online, evest, MT5], while Keepface lists Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Evest or Keepface?
Evest carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 2 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Keepface carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.