Skip to content
World Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXPIG vs Keepface: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXPIG (Prime Intermarket Group Asia Pacific Limited) and Keepface (Keepface Global, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxpig-vs-keepface

FXPIG outranks Keepface by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXPIG holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Keepface holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXPIGKeepfaceScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite3.02.0+1.0FXPIG
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.02.0+1.0FXPIG
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.01.0+1.0FXPIG
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight3.02.0+1.0FXPIG
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight3.02.0+1.0FXPIG

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXPIG vs Keepface

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXPIG vs Keepface
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXPIG and Keepface.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXPIGKeepface
Primary Legal NamePrime Intermarket Group Asia Pacific LimitedKeepface Global, Inc.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED): #336851UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressLisi Lake, Hall 1, Floor 2, Flat N6, Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159 Lisi Veranda, Phase 3, Building B4, Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159 1276, Govant Building, Kumul Highway Port Vila, Republic of VanuatuCluster R, AstroLabs, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, PO Box 336851, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Forex, Metals, EnergiesInfluencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesVietnamese, Burmese, English, ThaiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXPIG and Keepface against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXPIG vs Keepface

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXPIG or Keepface?

Both FXPIG and Keepface hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXPIG maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Keepface maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED), UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXPIG and Keepface?

In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXPIG records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Keepface at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FXPIG and Keepface differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXPIG lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Metals, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Keepface lists Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXPIG or Keepface?

FXPIG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Keepface carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXPIG vs Keepface (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | World Firm Ledger