1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Request Finance vs Retro: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Request Finance (Request Network Pte. Ltd.) and Retro (Retro) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Request Finance outranks Retro by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Request Finance holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Retro holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Request Finance | Retro | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Request Finance |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Request Finance |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Request Finance |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Request Finance |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Request Finance |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Request Finance vs Retro
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Request Finance | Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Request Network Pte. Ltd. | Retro |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 10 Anson Road, #22-15 International Plaza, Singapore 079903 | SG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Request Finance and Retro against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Request Finance vs Retro
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Request Finance or Retro?
Both Request Finance and Retro hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Request Finance maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Retro maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Request Finance and Retro?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Request Finance records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Retro at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Request Finance and Retro differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Request Finance lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Retro lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Request Finance or Retro?
Request Finance carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Retro carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.