1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
SCI vs Swipe.io: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SCI (Satoshi Citadel Industries) and Swipe.io (Swipe Technologies Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Swipe.io outranks SCI by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.3 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, SCI holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Swipe.io holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | SCI | Swipe.io | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.3 | Swipe.io |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.8 | +0.8 | Swipe.io |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.5 | +0.5 | Swipe.io |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.6 | +0.6 | Swipe.io |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: SCI vs Swipe.io
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | SCI | Swipe.io |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Satoshi Citadel Industries | Swipe Technologies Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare SCI and Swipe.io against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: SCI vs Swipe.io
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SCI or Swipe.io?
Both SCI and Swipe.io hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, SCI maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Swipe.io maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SCI and Swipe.io?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SCI records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Swipe.io at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.8, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do SCI and Swipe.io differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
SCI lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Swipe.io lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SCI or Swipe.io?
SCI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Swipe.io carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.