Skip to content
World Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Sharenet vs Tickmill: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Sharenet (Sharenet) and Tickmill (Tickmill UK Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: sharenet-vs-tickmill

Tickmill outranks Sharenet by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Sharenet holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tickmill holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightSharenetTickmillScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.07.0+2.0Tickmill
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.07.0+2.0Tickmill
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0Tickmill
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.08.0+3.0Tickmill
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.07.0+2.0Tickmill

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Sharenet vs Tickmill

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Sharenet vs Tickmill
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Sharenet and Tickmill.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeSharenetTickmill
Primary Legal NameSharenetTickmill UK Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address301, 3rd Floor, Imperial Terraces, The Terraces, Bellville, Cape Town, 75303rd Floor, 27 - 32 Old Jewry, London EC2R 8DQ, England
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCurrency pairs, index CFDs, energy products, precious metals and bondsForeign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), English, Italian, Polish, Malay and languages of other countries or regions
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)1 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Sharenet and Tickmill against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Sharenet vs Tickmill

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Sharenet or Tickmill?

Tickmill holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, Sharenet maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tickmill maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Sharenet and Tickmill?

In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Sharenet records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Tickmill at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Sharenet and Tickmill differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Sharenet lists Currency pairs, index CFDs, energy products, precious metals and bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tickmill lists Foreign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Sharenet or Tickmill?

Sharenet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tickmill carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Sharenet vs Tickmill (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | World Firm Ledger