Institution record
Bitpanda
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | Not supplied | Regulated | Bitpanda | — | |
Autorité des marchés financiers | Not supplied | Regulated | Bitpanda GmbH | 2025-4-14 | |
Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority | Not supplied | Regulated | Bitpanda | — | |
Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa | Not supplied | Regulated | Bitpanda | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda against peer institutions in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitpanda (this record) | BaFinAMFFI+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
State Bank of Pakistan (SBP)FSCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services CommissionFinancial Supervisory Service of Korea (FSS) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
FSRACentral Bank of Bahrain (CBB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 | |
Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED)UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 | |
SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
Bitpanda: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bitpanda's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Bitpanda (legal entity reference: Bitpanda) holds 4 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; FI (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official BaFin, AMF, FI public register.
Which of Bitpanda's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Bitpanda is tracked under our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Trading) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 4 recorded licences (BaFin, AMF, FI, CONSOB) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Bitpanda's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bitpanda carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com/fr) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to BaFin.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from World Firm Ledger relevant to Bitpanda's supervisory scope.
Sovereign Supervisory Architecture
South Africa FSCA: Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (FAIS) Licensing and Crypto FSPs
How multi-asset brokerages and cryptocurrency trading platforms secure Category I and II FSP licenses to tap into Africa’s largest institutional capital market.
monetary-policy
Emerging market central banks turn hawkish as inflation pressures mount, Citi says
Emerging market central banks turn hawkish as inflation pressures mount, Citi says: Institutional summary of the supplied primary disclosure. Cross-reference official supervisory registers for live updates.
regulatory-benchmarks
Middle East, Singapore, LatAm & Emerging-Market Regulated Institutions 2026 Licensing Benchmark: 6D Prudential Scorecard Across 109 Audited Entities
Comprehensive 2026 empirical benchmark covering 109 institutions and 98 competent authorities tracked by World Firm Ledger, detailing 6D compliance scores, contracting legal entities, and direct register verification.
compliance-forensics
How to Verify Middle East, Singapore, LatAm & Emerging-Market Regulated Institutions Licences & Detect Clone Firms: 2026 Supervisory Lookup Playbook
Practical 2026 due-diligence playbook from World Firm Ledger explaining how to authenticate licence numbers across 98 official registers and detect clone-firm domain spoofing before funding an account.