Institution record
whitebit
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register) | FVT000351 | Regulated | Whitebit Financial Company OÜ | 2020-11-24 | |
Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) | Not supplied | Regulated | UAB Clear White Technologies | 2018 | |
Czech National Bank | Not supplied | Regulated | WhiteBIT Financial Company s.r.o | 2021 | |
Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) | Not supplied | Regulated | WhiteBIT Tech Sp. Z.o.o | 2021 | |
Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) | Not supplied | Regulated | — | 2022 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing whitebit against peer institutions in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| whitebit (this record) | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)CNB+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
State Bank of Pakistan (SBP)FSCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services CommissionFinancial Supervisory Service of Korea (FSS) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
FSRACentral Bank of Bahrain (CBB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 | |
Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED)UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 | |
SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
whitebit: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is whitebit's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, whitebit (legal entity reference: whitebit) holds 5 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 5 are marked regulated or registered: Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register) — licence FVT000351, status: regulated; Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; CNB (Czech National Bank) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB public register.
Which of whitebit's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
whitebit is registered at J. Basanavičiaus g. 26, Vilnius, LT-03224, Lithuania and tracked under our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 5 recorded licences (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), Bulgarian National Bank (BNB)) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is whitebit's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
whitebit carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to whitebit's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with whitebit, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (whitebit.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register).
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from World Firm Ledger relevant to whitebit's supervisory scope.
Emerging Corridors
DIFC DFSA Authorized Firm Audit — Cross-Border Branch Filing: 2026 Institutional Audit & Desk Controls
2026 institutional desk audit of difc dfsa authorized firm audit focusing on cross-border branch filing. Covers statutory register tie-out (LATAM-CVM-CNBV), 8.4 bps quantitative benchmarks, mathematical calibration, and compliance verification workflows.
Emerging Corridors
Latin American Financial Corridors: Brazil CVM vs. Mexico CNBV Fintech and Brokerage Regulation
How institutional brokers and cross-border payment facilitators expand into São Paulo and Mexico City, navigating local banking charters and instant retail payment rails.
Emerging Corridors
MAS TRM Technology Risk Checklist — Licence Condition Digest: 2026 Institutional Audit & Desk Controls
2026 institutional desk audit of mas trm technology risk checklist focusing on licence condition digest. Covers statutory register tie-out (LATAM-CVM-CNBV), 15.8 bps quantitative benchmarks, mathematical calibration, and compliance verification workflows.
Emerging Corridors
AU ASIC AFSL Responsible Manager — Market Entry Checklist: 2026 Institutional Audit & Desk Controls
2026 institutional desk audit of au asic afsl responsible manager focusing on market entry checklist. Covers statutory register tie-out (LATAM-CVM-CNBV), 16.1 bps quantitative benchmarks, mathematical calibration, and compliance verification workflows.