1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
365Falcon vs AEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 365Falcon (365FALCON) and AEX (AEX Global) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
AEX outranks 365Falcon by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, 365Falcon holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas AEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 365Falcon | AEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | AEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | AEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | AEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | AEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 365Falcon vs AEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 365Falcon | AEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 365FALCON | AEX Global |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CN | CN |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Virtual currency exchange |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 365Falcon and AEX against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 365Falcon vs AEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 365Falcon or AEX?
Both 365Falcon and AEX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 365Falcon maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas AEX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 365Falcon and AEX?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 365Falcon records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with AEX at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 365Falcon and AEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
365Falcon lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while AEX lists Virtual currency exchange with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 365Falcon or AEX?
365Falcon carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while AEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.