1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AGMH vs Perpetual Protocol: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AGMH (AGM Group Holdings Inc.) and Perpetual Protocol (Perpetual Protocol) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Perpetual Protocol outranks AGMH by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.4 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, AGMH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Perpetual Protocol holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AGMH | Perpetual Protocol | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.4 | +0.4 | Perpetual Protocol |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.4 | +0.4 | Perpetual Protocol |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Perpetual Protocol |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.5 | +0.5 | Perpetual Protocol |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.3 | +0.3 | Perpetual Protocol |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AGMH vs Perpetual Protocol
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AGMH | Perpetual Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AGM Group Holdings Inc. | Perpetual Protocol |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Room 1502-3 15/F., Connuaght Commercial Building, 185 Wanchai Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong | Taipei City, Taiwan |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AGMH and Perpetual Protocol against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AGMH vs Perpetual Protocol
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AGMH or Perpetual Protocol?
Both AGMH and Perpetual Protocol hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AGMH maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Perpetual Protocol maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AGMH and Perpetual Protocol?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AGMH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Perpetual Protocol at 2.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.4, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do AGMH and Perpetual Protocol differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AGMH lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Perpetual Protocol lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AGMH or Perpetual Protocol?
AGMH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Perpetual Protocol carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.