Skip to content
World Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BPS CAPITAL vs Keepface: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BPS CAPITAL (BPS CAPITAL) and Keepface (Keepface Global, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bps-capital-vs-keepface

Keepface outranks BPS CAPITAL by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.5)

On supervisory breadth, BPS CAPITAL holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Keepface holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBPS CAPITALKeepfaceScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.52.0+0.5Keepface
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.52.0+0.5Keepface
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.52.0+0.5Keepface
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.52.0+0.5Keepface

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BPS CAPITAL vs Keepface

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BPS CAPITAL vs Keepface
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BPS CAPITAL and Keepface.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBPS CAPITALKeepface
Primary Legal NameBPS CAPITALKeepface Global, Inc.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED): #336851UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressFLAT B5,1/F MANNING IND BLDG 116-118 HOW MING ST KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONGCluster R, AstroLabs, Jumeirah Lakes Towers, PO Box 336851, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, Metals, Energy, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies and Indices CFDs, StocksInfluencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Vietnamese, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BPS CAPITAL and Keepface against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BPS CAPITAL vs Keepface

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BPS CAPITAL or Keepface?

Both BPS CAPITAL and Keepface hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BPS CAPITAL maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Keepface maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DET / DED), UAE Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BPS CAPITAL and Keepface?

In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BPS CAPITAL records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Keepface at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do BPS CAPITAL and Keepface differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BPS CAPITAL lists Forex, Metals, Energy, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies and Indices CFDs, Stocks with execution software [MT4], while Keepface lists Influencer marketing platform, PR services, influencer analytics, AI-driven tools, employee and customer advocacy with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BPS CAPITAL or Keepface?

BPS CAPITAL carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Keepface carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BPS CAPITAL vs Keepface (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | World Firm Ledger