1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
China Galaxy vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of China Galaxy (China Galaxy International Financial Holdings Limited) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
SCDEX outranks China Galaxy by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.8)
On supervisory breadth, China Galaxy holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | China Galaxy | SCDEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.8 | 9.3 | +2.5 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.8 | 9.5 | +2.7 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 9.3 | +5.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 9.2 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 9.4 | +2.6 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 9.1 | +2.3 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: China Galaxy vs SCDEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | China Galaxy | SCDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | China Galaxy International Financial Holdings Limited | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Low risk |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 20/F, Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Flat 1, 36/F, COSCO Tower, Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong Flat 1, 36/F, COSCO Tower, Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong 8/F, May May Building, Nos.683-685 Nathan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Securities brokerage (including stocks, funds, bonds, derivatives and futures), securities investment consulting, financial consulting for securities trading and securities investment, securities underwriting and sponsorship, securities proprietary trading, and securities asset management. | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare China Galaxy and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: China Galaxy vs SCDEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: China Galaxy or SCDEX?
China Galaxy holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, China Galaxy maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between China Galaxy and SCDEX?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), China Galaxy records an Overall Score of 6.8 (Risk & Licensing: 6.8, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 6.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).
How do China Galaxy and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
China Galaxy lists Securities brokerage (including stocks, funds, bonds, derivatives and futures), securities investment consulting, financial consulting for securities trading and securities investment, securities underwriting and sponsorship, securities proprietary trading, and securities asset management. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: China Galaxy or SCDEX?
China Galaxy carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.