1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Cobo Wallet vs DEA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cobo Wallet (Cobo Global Limited) and DEA (Digital Entertainment Asset) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
DEA outranks Cobo Wallet by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.3)
On supervisory breadth, Cobo Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DEA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Cobo Wallet | DEA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.3 | 5.0 | +1.7 | DEA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.3 | 5.0 | +1.7 | DEA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Cobo Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.3 | 5.0 | +1.7 | DEA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.3 | 5.0 | +1.7 | DEA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cobo Wallet vs DEA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Cobo Wallet | DEA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Cobo Global Limited | Digital Entertainment Asset |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | SG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Cobo Wallet and DEA against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Cobo Wallet vs DEA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cobo Wallet or DEA?
Both Cobo Wallet and DEA hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Cobo Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DEA maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cobo Wallet and DEA?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cobo Wallet records an Overall Score of 3.3 (Risk & Licensing: 3.3, Brand: 3.3, Market Influence: 3.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with DEA at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Cobo Wallet and DEA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Cobo Wallet lists Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while DEA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cobo Wallet or DEA?
Cobo Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DEA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.