1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CommSec vs STON.fi: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CommSec (Commonwealth Securities Limited) and STON.fi (STON.fi) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions headquartered across Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
CommSec outranks STON.fi by +4.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CommSec holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STON.fi holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CommSec | STON.fi | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.5 | 2.0 | +4.5 | CommSec |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.5 | 2.0 | +4.5 | CommSec |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | CommSec |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.5 | 2.0 | +4.5 | CommSec |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.5 | 2.0 | +4.5 | CommSec |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CommSec vs STON.fi
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CommSec | STON.fi |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Commonwealth Securities Limited | STON.fi |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Commonwealth Bank Place South' Level 1, 11 Harbour Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 Commonwealth Securities Locked Bag 22 Australia Square NSW 1215 | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Australian shares, margin loans, cash, options, ETFs, warrants, fixed income securities, international shares | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CommSec and STON.fi against other regulated peers in our financial institutions headquartered across singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CommSec vs STON.fi
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CommSec or STON.fi?
CommSec holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, CommSec maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STON.fi maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CommSec and STON.fi?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CommSec records an Overall Score of 6.5 (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with STON.fi at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CommSec and STON.fi differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CommSec lists Australian shares, margin loans, cash, options, ETFs, warrants, fixed income securities, international shares with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while STON.fi lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CommSec or STON.fi?
CommSec carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STON.fi carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.