Skip to content
World Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CommSec vs uTrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CommSec (Commonwealth Securities Limited) and uTrade (uTrade Markets Incorporated) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: commsec-vs-utrade-4213

CommSec outranks uTrade by +4.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, CommSec holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas uTrade holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCommSecuTradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.52.0+4.5CommSec
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.51.0+5.5CommSec
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.02.0+2.0CommSec
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.51.0+5.5CommSec
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.51.0+5.5CommSec

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CommSec vs uTrade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CommSec vs uTrade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CommSec and uTrade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCommSecuTrade
Primary Legal NameCommonwealth Securities LimiteduTrade Markets Incorporated
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressCommonwealth Bank Place South' Level 1, 11 Harbour Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 Commonwealth Securities Locked Bag 22 Australia Square NSW 1215AU
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesAustralian shares, margin loans, cash, options, ETFs, warrants, fixed income securities, international sharesForeign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, indices, digital currencies
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CommSec and uTrade against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CommSec vs uTrade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CommSec or uTrade?

CommSec holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, CommSec maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas uTrade maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CommSec and uTrade?

In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CommSec records an Overall Score of 6.5 (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with uTrade at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do CommSec and uTrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CommSec lists Australian shares, margin loans, cash, options, ETFs, warrants, fixed income securities, international shares with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while uTrade lists Foreign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, indices, digital currencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CommSec or uTrade?

CommSec carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while uTrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CommSec vs uTrade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | World Firm Ledger