1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CoolWallet S vs Perpetual Protocol: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CoolWallet S (CoolBitX Ltd.) and Perpetual Protocol (Perpetual Protocol) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Perpetual Protocol outranks CoolWallet S by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.4 vs 2.3)
On supervisory breadth, CoolWallet S holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Perpetual Protocol holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CoolWallet S | Perpetual Protocol | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.3 | 2.4 | +0.1 | Perpetual Protocol |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.2 | 2.4 | +0.2 | Perpetual Protocol |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.4 | 2.3 | +0.1 | CoolWallet S |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CoolWallet S vs Perpetual Protocol
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CoolWallet S | Perpetual Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CoolBitX Ltd. | Perpetual Protocol |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | No. 287, Section 3, Nanjing East Road, Zhongshan District, Taipei City. | Taipei City, Taiwan |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Traditional), English, French | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CoolWallet S and Perpetual Protocol against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CoolWallet S vs Perpetual Protocol
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CoolWallet S or Perpetual Protocol?
Both CoolWallet S and Perpetual Protocol hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CoolWallet S maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Perpetual Protocol maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CoolWallet S and Perpetual Protocol?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CoolWallet S records an Overall Score of 2.3 (Risk & Licensing: 2.2, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Perpetual Protocol at 2.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.4, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do CoolWallet S and Perpetual Protocol differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CoolWallet S lists Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Perpetual Protocol lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CoolWallet S or Perpetual Protocol?
CoolWallet S carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Perpetual Protocol carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.