1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fathom DEX vs FMASTERS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fathom DEX (Fathom DEX) and FMASTERS (FMASTERS) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Fathom DEX and FMASTERS are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fathom DEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FMASTERS holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fathom DEX | FMASTERS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Fathom DEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Fathom DEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fathom DEX vs FMASTERS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fathom DEX | FMASTERS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fathom DEX | FMASTERS |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | SG | CN |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | decentralised exchange (DEX), stablecoins FXD, lending, liquidity mining, governance mechanisms | Forex, metals, energy, agricultural products, stocks, indices, cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, LTC, XRP) |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fathom DEX and FMASTERS against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fathom DEX vs FMASTERS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fathom DEX or FMASTERS?
Both Fathom DEX and FMASTERS hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Fathom DEX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FMASTERS maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fathom DEX and FMASTERS?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fathom DEX records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with FMASTERS at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Fathom DEX and FMASTERS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fathom DEX lists decentralised exchange (DEX), stablecoins FXD, lending, liquidity mining, governance mechanisms with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FMASTERS lists Forex, metals, energy, agricultural products, stocks, indices, cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, LTC, XRP) with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fathom DEX or FMASTERS?
Fathom DEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FMASTERS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.