1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fortune vs Stumac: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortune (FORTUNE (HK) SECURITIES LIMITED) and Stumac (Stumac Team Creation Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Fortune outranks Stumac by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fortune holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Stumac holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fortune | Stumac | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Fortune |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Fortune |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Fortune |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Fortune |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Fortune |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortune vs Stumac
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fortune | Stumac |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FORTUNE (HK) SECURITIES LIMITED | Stumac Team Creation Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hong Kong Queen’s Road Central 183 COSCO Tower 41/F Room 4102-06 | FLAT A100 3/F MANNING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 116-118 HOW MING STREET KWUN TONG KOWLOON Unit 303D, 3/F Block A Hung Hom Commercial Centre, 39 Ma Tau Wai Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Investment banking, securities brokerage, asset management, margin financing, insurance brokerage, investment immigration, debt investment and equity investment | Spot indices, CFDs, Precious metals, Currency pairs, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fortune and Stumac against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fortune vs Stumac
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortune or Stumac?
Fortune holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Fortune maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Stumac maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortune and Stumac?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortune records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Stumac at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Fortune and Stumac differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fortune lists Investment banking, securities brokerage, asset management, margin financing, insurance brokerage, investment immigration, debt investment and equity investment with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Stumac lists Spot indices, CFDs, Precious metals, Currency pairs, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortune or Stumac?
Fortune carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Stumac carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.