1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Omada Global vs STACS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Omada Global (Omada Global) and STACS (Hashstacs Pte Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Omada Global and STACS are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Omada Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STACS holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Omada Global | STACS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Omada Global vs STACS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Omada Global | STACS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Omada Global | Hashstacs Pte Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 3A, Unit 3A-Level 2,3A, Labuan Times Square, Jalan Merdeka, Labuan F.T 87000, Malaysia. | 7 Temasek Boulevard, #12-07 Suntec Tower One, Singapore 038987 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot FX and commodities | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Malay, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Omada Global and STACS against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Omada Global vs STACS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Omada Global or STACS?
Both Omada Global and STACS hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Omada Global maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STACS maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Omada Global and STACS?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Omada Global records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with STACS at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Omada Global and STACS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Omada Global lists Spot FX and commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while STACS lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Omada Global or STACS?
Omada Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STACS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.