1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Point95 Global vs Portis: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Point95 Global (Point95 Global (Hong Kong) Limited) and Portis (Ethereum Horizons Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Point95 Global and Portis are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.4 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, Point95 Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Portis holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Point95 Global | Portis | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.4 | 1.6 | +0.2 | Portis |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.4 | +0.2 | Point95 Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Point95 Global vs Portis
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Point95 Global | Portis |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Point95 Global (Hong Kong) Limited | Ethereum Horizons Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | 3 Malkhei Y'Israel St., Tel Aviv, Israel 69358 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Point95 Global and Portis against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Point95 Global vs Portis
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Point95 Global or Portis?
Both Point95 Global and Portis hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Point95 Global maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Portis maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Point95 Global and Portis?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Point95 Global records an Overall Score of 1.4 (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Portis at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Point95 Global and Portis differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Point95 Global lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Portis lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Point95 Global or Portis?
Point95 Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Portis carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.