1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
STON.fi vs Stumac: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of STON.fi (STON.fi) and Stumac (Stumac Team Creation Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
STON.fi and Stumac are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, STON.fi holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Stumac holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | STON.fi | Stumac | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: STON.fi vs Stumac
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | STON.fi | Stumac |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | STON.fi | Stumac Team Creation Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | FLAT A100 3/F MANNING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 116-118 HOW MING STREET KWUN TONG KOWLOON Unit 303D, 3/F Block A Hung Hom Commercial Centre, 39 Ma Tau Wai Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Trading | Spot indices, CFDs, Precious metals, Currency pairs, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare STON.fi and Stumac against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: STON.fi vs Stumac
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: STON.fi or Stumac?
Both STON.fi and Stumac hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, STON.fi maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Stumac maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between STON.fi and Stumac?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), STON.fi records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Stumac at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do STON.fi and Stumac differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
STON.fi lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Stumac lists Spot indices, CFDs, Precious metals, Currency pairs, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: STON.fi or Stumac?
STON.fi carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Stumac carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.