1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
China Galaxy vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of China Galaxy (China Galaxy International Financial Holdings Limited) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
China Galaxy outranks Magic Compass by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.8 vs 6.7)
On supervisory breadth, China Galaxy holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | China Galaxy | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.8 | 6.7 | +0.1 | China Galaxy |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.8 | 4.2 | +2.6 | China Galaxy |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 6.8 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 5.0 | +1.8 | China Galaxy |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: China Galaxy vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | China Galaxy | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | China Galaxy International Financial Holdings Limited | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 20/F, Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Flat 1, 36/F, COSCO Tower, Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong Flat 1, 36/F, COSCO Tower, Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong 8/F, May May Building, Nos.683-685 Nathan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Securities brokerage (including stocks, funds, bonds, derivatives and futures), securities investment consulting, financial consulting for securities trading and securities investment, securities underwriting and sponsorship, securities proprietary trading, and securities asset management. | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare China Galaxy and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: China Galaxy vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: China Galaxy or Magic Compass?
Both China Galaxy and Magic Compass hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, China Galaxy maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between China Galaxy and Magic Compass?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), China Galaxy records an Overall Score of 6.8 (Risk & Licensing: 6.8, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 6.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do China Galaxy and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
China Galaxy lists Securities brokerage (including stocks, funds, bonds, derivatives and futures), securities investment consulting, financial consulting for securities trading and securities investment, securities underwriting and sponsorship, securities proprietary trading, and securities asset management. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: China Galaxy or Magic Compass?
China Galaxy carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.