1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs Pyypl: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and Pyypl (Pyypl) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution records: Singapore, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and emerging markets
Magic Compass outranks Pyypl by +3.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Pyypl holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | Pyypl | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 3.0 | +3.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 3.0 | +1.2 | Magic Compass |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 3.0 | +3.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Magic Compass |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs Pyypl
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | Pyypl |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | Pyypl |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FSRA: #170031Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | Office 106, 16th Floor, Al Khatem Tower, ADGM Square, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and Pyypl against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution records: singapore, asia-pacific, the middle east and emerging markets slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs Pyypl
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or Pyypl?
Pyypl holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Pyypl maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSRA, Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and Pyypl?
In World Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Pyypl at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Magic Compass and Pyypl differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Pyypl lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or Pyypl?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pyypl carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.